
Jill S. Schneiderman on why Buddhists need to put their foot down and stand up to oil companies’ destruction of the environment.
“What counts is not the enormity of the task, but the size of the courage,” says Matthieu Ricard, a Buddhist monk and confidant of the Dalai Lama who was dubbed “Mr. Happy” after U.S. neuroscientists declared him the most content man they ever tested. Ricard’s statement resonated for me in light of continued developments in what I’ve come to think of as the Earth Day BP Oil Catastrophe. We’re going to need this kind of inspiration in order to deal with the Gulf of Mexico mess because the magnitude of the task before us—stopping the forcefully gushing oil, cleaning up devastated habitat, caring for injured or soon-to-be-harmed living beings in the path of the petroleum, protecting as yet unaffected regions—boggles the mind as it stirs the heart.
Since I’ve just returned from a weeklong Jewish Mindfulness Meditation Teacher Training retreat, I’ve been away from the news of this calamity. But sad to say, my geologist’s perspective leaves me unsurprised by broadcasts of impotent efforts of oil industry professionals to handle the tragedy. Why? Because I’ve been sitting for the last week paying attention to body sensations, I’ll just say that we earth scientists feel in our guts the vast scales of Earth time and space; (it’s why I write about them). As Congress and a federal panel in Louisiana begin their inquiry into the situation not one person should be perplexed by the sequence of events that follow the explosion and sinking of the Deepwater Horizon oilrig. Here’s why.
First of all, this event is much more than just another “oil spill.” To me, the word spill suggests flow from a confined space and implies a finite amount of liquid. The monster in the Gulf of Mexico is a gusher, a blowout, an uncontrolled flow of oil from a well bored into the earth, what drillers call a “wild well.” Dr. Frankenstein has put a spigot in the Earth and can’t shut it off.
When in September 2009 BP announced its discovery of the Tiber oilfield—what the workers on the Deepwater Horizon were boring into when it exploded—they characterized it as “giant” and meant to convey that their find contained between four and six billion barrels of oil; this contrasts with a “huge” oilfield usually considered to contain 250 million barrels of the stuff. Regardless of whether it’s giant or huge, this Gulf of Mexico event is more than a spill. Basically we’ve tapped into a source of oil that will not be exhausted quickly. Isn’t that ironic?
It’s impossible to conceptualize such vast quantities, and as the crude oil continues to spew for the 24th consecutive day at daily rates reported to be 210,000 gallons, I’d like to help. Check out a Google Earth map website by Paul Rademacher that will allow you to compare the horizontal extent of the oil with the geographic size of your city, county or state. I checked Barbados, the tiny island on which I currently live; the crude oil would blanket it completely.
Ditto my home county—Dutchess in New York. It’s way bigger than Rhode Island, our convenient measuring rod for environmental disaster (Remember the Larsen Ice Shelf? The 220 meter thick—three football fields—chunk of ice “the size of Rhode Island” that disintegrated in 2002 after having been stable for up to 12,000 years.) Check the places that matter most to you and sense in your gut the feeling caused by the spatial comparison.
And speaking of space, oil and gas executives crowed about their record-setting achievement, touting it as one of the deepest wells ever achieved by their industry—drilled 35,055 feet deep into the Earth’s crust beneath 4,132 feet of water. You may wonder, “Just how deep into the earth is that?” Let’s put it this way, transcontinental flights cruise at that elevation above the Earth’s surface. Next time you are in an airplane, picture a pipe connecting your jet to the surface of the Earth and you’ll have a picture of the distance that BP went to access the Tiber Oilfield black gold.
Would that these innovators had gone to such extremes in order to apply to their work an ethical code that includes the Precautionary Principle:
“When an activity raises threats of harm to the environment or human health, precautionary measures should be taken even if some cause and effect relationships are not fully established scientifically.”
Regrettably, precautionary action has been the exception rather than the rule in U.S. environmental policy. Perhaps it has operated to the frustration of some in decisions concerning disposal of high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, but the Earth Day BP Oil Catastrophe demonstrates the virtue of Vorsorgeprinzip, German for “precautionary principle.” Literally, Vorsorge means “forecaring” and conveys forethought and preparedness—not simply “caution.” I say that a plan to bore “the deepest well ever” into the Earth, should be accompanied by accurately scaled and well-tested models for responding to unexpected contingencies. Ahimsa, first do no harm.
The first homework assignment of my Jewish Mindfulness Teacher Training program was to read Jack Kornfield on the five basic Buddhist training precepts. Number two, “we undertake the precept of refraining from taking that which is not given,” strikes me as particularly apt given the circumstances in the Gulf. We consent to not take that which does not belong to us. We agree to bring consciousness to the use of all of the earth’s resources in a respectful and ecological way.
When will we, like Job, clap our hands to our mouths with the realization that human beings occupy an infinitesimal place within a divine whole? When will the “knowledge” of modernity succumb to the wisdom of the ancients? Could the answer to Job’s question of how long must his people suffer, “Till towns lie waste without inhabitants, and houses without people; and the ground lies waste and desolate (Isaiah 6:11),” be also the answer to the question, when will the oil stop gushing? The chutzpah of humans got us into this mess; humility will help us out of it. We will need clear mind, wise heart, and sizable courage to say dayenu, enough.
Thanks for the informative article, Jill. Your characterization of "giant" and "huge" oilfields brought to mind the average daily consumption figures for oil. According to the Energy Information Administration (link below), the world consumes an average over 85 million barrels of oil every day! At that rate, a "huge" oilfield will be expended in just under three days. I think this is an interesting perspective for readers to consider.
EIA Source:http://www.eia.doe.gov/basics/quickoil.html
I came across this article:
I am making an anonymous comment to tell from personal experience that bodyguards and security for oil companies have told me personally that part of their high paying salaries was EXACTLY TO kill any protesters or suspected saboteurs of the oil pipelines in foreign countries. The oil companies not only knew about this, they paid the security to use machine gun weapons on the native people that opposed the pipelines.
***
There have been death threats and assassinations.
BP accused on death threats
MEP says bodyguard of company executive threatened to `skin' Colombian protester
Nicholas Schoon
One more point – for the author: I've read a few places on the web that it's the Macondo oilfield, not the Tiber, that is the location of the recent spill. The Deepwater Horizon had previously investigated the Tiber, but had moved on to the Macondo and that's where the accident occurred. You may want to take a look and either modify the online article or post a clarifying reply to my comment. Thanks!
This is such a well written and frightening account of what has happened because of greed and thoughtlessness. Let us all remember that we are simply visitors on the planet for this short time. Dayenu!
Hi, Tyler and Paula,
Thanks for your comments. I'd like to address the point that Tyler raises (thanks Tyler). Here's a link to an article from the May 10, 2010 Bloomburg BusinessWeek that clarifies the issue:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&a…
In September 2009 BP tapped into the newly discovered Tiber oilfield, estimated to hold at least 3 billion barrels of oil. The field is deep beneath the floor of the Gulf of Mexico and is covered by nearly mile-deep water.
BP and its drilling contractor, Transocean, bored an exceptionally deep well using the "Deepwater Horizon" (a $365 million drill rig the size of two football fields that cost $500,000/day to use) to reach the Tiber oilfield. Since the Deepwater Horizon is a drill rig–its purpose is to drill the well–when finished drilling it moved on to the next job which was to drill the Macondo well, also under a mile of seawater, in Mississippi Canyon Block 252. While drilling that well, the explosion occurred that sunk the drilling rig.
Yes, it's the Macondo well from which the oil is gushing. My original point remains the same: we have an uncontrolled effusion of oil from a voluminous source initially extracted in risky fashion without a tenable back-up plan in the event of emergency.
This also raises a point about language and proprietary interests. It's hard to find out the names of oilfield prospects and to understand the words used to describe equipment and techniques. This is by design of course; oil companies don't want competitors to know what they're working on. They also use jargon to obscure truth so that 'non-experts' won't be able to challenge their methods. They want the public to trust them as experts. In my opinion it's one of the reasons the environmental justice movement is so important.
This is an excellent article. Are you familiar with the environmental disaster that occurred in Libby, Montana? The company WR Grace lied about asbestos contamination in mines, with the result that there is now widespread air contamination and deaths from an awful lung condition called asbestosis. WR Grace was aware of the asbestos-health risk but they concealed it by blaming worker health problems on smoking.
Just one year ago, they were acquitted. From wikipedia:
On Friday May 8th 2009, W.R. Grace was acquitted of "knowingly" harming the people of Libby Montana. Fred Festa, chairman, president and CEO said in a statement, "the company worked hard to keep the operations in compliance with the laws and standards of the day." David Uhlmann, a former top environmental crimes prosecutor has been quoted as saying about the W.R. Grace: "There's never been a case where so many people were sickened or killed by environmental crime." The W.R. Grace case has long festered in the court system on a 10-count indictment including charges of wire fraud and obstruction of justice. W.R. Grace has voluntarily paid millions of dollars in medical bills for 900 Libby residents.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._R._Grace_and_Comp…
Please remove this comment if off-topic but I'm sending it because this court case, in which Grace was acquitted, ended just one year ago. And for the town of Libby, this has been a disaster comparable to what is happening to Florida and other states now. And yet few people seem to have heard of it unless they are environmental activists.
The frightening part is that not only did Grace poison the environment and wreck people's health, they were acquitted.